. . . . "61065"^^ . . . . . . . "historick\u00E9m Je\u017E\u00ED\u0161i"@cs . . . . . . . "historick\u00FD Je\u017E\u00ED\u0161"@cs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "historick\u00E9ho Je\u017E\u00ED\u0161e"@cs . . "historickou p\u0159esnost\u00ED"@cs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Historick\u00FD Je\u017E\u00ED\u0161 je ozna\u010Den\u00ED pro pokusy rekonstruovat \u017Eivot a u\u010Den\u00ED Je\u017E\u00ED\u0161e Nazaretsk\u00E9ho pomoc\u00ED historicko-kritick\u00E9 metody, na rozd\u00EDl od c\u00EDrkevn\u00ED christologick\u00E9 nauky (Kristus dogmatu) \u010Di jin\u00FDch k\u0159es\u0165ansk\u00FDch interpretac\u00ED Je\u017E\u00ED\u0161e (Kristus v\u00EDry). Bere rovn\u011B\u017E v \u00FAvahu dobov\u00FD a kulturn\u00ED kontext, ve kter\u00E9m Je\u017E\u00ED\u0161 \u017Eil.Od 18. stolet\u00ED prob\u011Bhly t\u0159i vlny hled\u00E1n\u00ED historick\u00E9ho Je\u017E\u00ED\u0161e, z nich\u017E ka\u017Ed\u00E1 m\u011Bla sv\u00E9 charakteristiky a zakl\u00E1dala se na r\u016Fzn\u00FDch badatelsk\u00FDch krit\u00E9ri\u00EDch. Nad\u0161en\u00ED prvn\u00EDho hled\u00E1n\u00ED odezn\u011Blo po kritice Alberta Schweitzera z r. 1906, v n\u00ED\u017E upozornil na r\u016Fzn\u00E9 nedostatky p\u0159\u00EDstup\u016F, kter\u00E9 se v jeho dob\u011B pou\u017E\u00EDvaly. Druh\u00E9 hled\u00E1n\u00ED za\u010Dalo v roce 1953 a uvedlo \u0159adu nov\u00FDch postup\u016F, ale vy\u010Derpalo se ji\u017E v 70. letech. Od 80. let pak skupina badatel\u016F za\u010D\u00EDn\u00E1 t\u0159et\u00ED hled\u00E1n\u00ED, kter\u00E9 pokra\u010Duje do nov\u00E9ho stolet\u00ED.Existuje \u0161irok\u00FD akademick\u00FD konsenzus o samotn\u00E9 Je\u017E\u00ED\u0161ov\u011B existenci, do ur\u010Dit\u00E9 m\u00EDry tak\u00E9 o z\u00E1kladn\u00EDch ud\u00E1lostech v jeho \u017Eivot\u011B. Jednotliv\u00E9 Je\u017E\u00ED\u0161ovy portr\u00E9ty se v\u0161ak mezi sebou v\u00FDznamn\u011B li\u0161\u00ED."@cs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Historick\u00FD Je\u017E\u00ED\u0161"@cs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "16461776"^^ . . . . . . . "historick\u00E9ho"@cs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "179"^^ . . . . "378793"^^ . . . . "Historick\u00FD Je\u017E\u00ED\u0161 je ozna\u010Den\u00ED pro pokusy rekonstruovat \u017Eivot a u\u010Den\u00ED Je\u017E\u00ED\u0161e Nazaretsk\u00E9ho pomoc\u00ED historicko-kritick\u00E9 metody, na rozd\u00EDl od c\u00EDrkevn\u00ED christologick\u00E9 nauky (Kristus dogmatu) \u010Di jin\u00FDch k\u0159es\u0165ansk\u00FDch interpretac\u00ED Je\u017E\u00ED\u0161e (Kristus v\u00EDry). Bere rovn\u011B\u017E v \u00FAvahu dobov\u00FD a kulturn\u00ED kontext, ve kter\u00E9m Je\u017E\u00ED\u0161 \u017Eil.Od 18. stolet\u00ED prob\u011Bhly t\u0159i vlny hled\u00E1n\u00ED historick\u00E9ho Je\u017E\u00ED\u0161e, z nich\u017E ka\u017Ed\u00E1 m\u011Bla sv\u00E9 charakteristiky a zakl\u00E1dala se na r\u016Fzn\u00FDch badatelsk\u00FDch krit\u00E9ri\u00EDch."@cs . "Historick\u00FD Je\u017E\u00ED\u0161"@cs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Historick\u00FD Je\u017E\u00ED\u0161 \u2013 Historick\u00E9 prameny"@cs . . . . . . "Je\u017E\u00ED\u0161"@cs . . . . . . "historick\u00E9 osoby Je\u017E\u00ED\u0161e Nazaretsk\u00E9ho"@cs . . . . . . . . . "historick\u00E9ho p\u016Fvodu Je\u017E\u00ED\u0161e"@cs . . . . . . . . . . . . .